(from a recent conversation on Facebook)
Mr. Parker demonstrating a Forward Bow transition (notice that I didn't say 'stance'); it can be argued that he is over-exaggerating the forward weight shift, but it is a clear display of the fact that a proper and structurally-practical 'Forward Bow' requires a sufficient weight-change AND shifting the hips FORWARD.
So many in Kenpo merely pivot their centerline, allowing the front hip to rotate backwards rather than PROJECT both hips FORWARD. - American Society of Kenpo Karate
Absolutely correct. If we're not shifting our weight forward then its still a 50/50 weighted stance. It has to be 60/40 and only a positive shift of weight over the front foot will give you that. We need to move our lower Dantian forward but without leaning. And our rear toes need to be facing dead on 12 o'clock so that our hips also face 12 o'clock. - John Fletcher
Mr. Parker as well as Lee Wedlake stated that when pivoting into a Forward Bow Stance the weight should be 70/30 the 70% should be on the forward leg with the body tilting forward angling diagonally so that there is a straight line from the shoulders to the rear heal. - William Di Carlo
The posture of Mr. Parker in the picture is correct. Feet, weight distribution, and fist posture are all correct. There are two common variances of the "forward bow" predicated on circumstances that include forward momentum and/or a stationary posture. The forward bow in motion is inherently unstable and substitutes principles based on purpose. The stationary version, to be effective, must employ different principles. Both are functional when used within design parameters. When people think of "stances," they tend to think of "feet." Stances are "whole body posture." That is, your feet may be correct; however, if other parts of your posture are incorrect, then the stances become dysfunctional. Additionally, how you arrive at the posture also has an impact. The end product may look perfect, but how you arrived at that posture is equally as important, and therefore, a picture-perfect posture may still be incorrect because the mechanical movements utilized to achieve that perfect look may be wrong and destroy your stance function even though it may not be externally visible. - Ron Chapél


