Sunday, February 15, 2026

Some thoughts on Master Key moves

(from a recent discussion on Facebook)

As we used to joke often with Mr. Huk Planas, “not everything in Kenpo is Five Swords….but most of it IS!” Master Key is a concept to help you reduce the system to the lowest common denominator, to make it easier to understand, process, and internalize for effective, spontaneous combat application, not a set list written in stone! If one analyzes motion, pretty much the whole system can be reduced to Five Swords, with Leaping Crane, Obscure Wing, Triggered Salute, Gift of Destruction, and Crossing Talon thrown in. - Max Bychkov


That would rest entirely on whether you are a technique focused or principle focused practitioner. The art of Kenpo is not about the myriad of “techniques & forms” but in one’s understanding, and use of the principles & concepts of motion found within them. As Mr. Parker & Mr. Mills shared with me; “Kenpo is not mystical, it is understanding universal principles & laws..”

Kenpo by definition is the analytical study of human motion through biology & physics. When we as practitioners understand this, inside & out, the “master keys” become self evident. Enjoy your journey. - Scott Hilderbrand


I like to describe them as recurring movement patterns, sometimes done on the inside of the arms and sometimes on the outside, sometimes on the so-called upper case and sometimes on the lower case. - Guru Bobi


The definition of, A MASTER KEY MOVE.,

Is a single move that can be used in more than One predicament with Equal effect. - Terence Crean


To answer the initial question...

According to the last version of the IKKA belt journals, the Master Key techniques are:

- Thundering Hammers

- Five Swords

- (Intellectual Departure – a Master Key technique, but not taught as part of the IKKA curriculum)

- Shielding Hammer

- Repeating Mace

- Locked Wing

- Thrusting Salute

- Parting Wings

- Hooking Wings

Some additional thoughts on the subject…

Others have mentioned this, but thought I'd add to the conversation since it's something I've been thinking about quite a bit these days.

The way I've come to understand things is that the Master Keys, or rather all techniques, aren't really about memorizing sequences. They're models.

Most students see these as responses to specific attacks, a prescribed sequence for a given scenario. That's the first stage of learning. It makes the ideas clear and gives you something concrete to practice.

But that's not really what they are.

They're combat models, each one a layered study you can spend years unpacking.

GM Parker outlined 21 concepts and principles of technique execution in Infinite Insights Volume 4. The techniques are built on those foundations.

Angle of entry. Marriage of gravity and torque. Opposing forces. Checking vs. striking. Width, height, and depth control. Anatomical targeting and effect.

That's just the surface.

Beneath that: backup mass, borrowed force, contouring, marriage of angle and weapon, dual counteraction, positional checks, rotational torque, sequential flow, stabilization, anchoring...

And beneath that: timing transitions, range collapse, structural alignment under pressure, reactionary control, the relationship between minor moves and major strikes, how a check becomes a strike and a strike becomes a position...

Each Master Key contains multiple levels of concepts and principles working simultaneously. The attack/defense sequence is just the delivery system.

The real content is what's happening inside the technique, and how all 21 principles come into play.

To me, the training deepens when you stop asking "What comes next?" and start asking:

- What happens if I reverse this motion?

- What if I apply it on a different plane?

- What if the target changes but the concept stays the same?

You take them apart. Re-assemble them.Find their application in opposite directions, alternate heights, inverted angles.

Each Master Key is a three-dimensional problem-solving framework that teach you how Kenpo thinks.

That's why their DNA shows up everywhere in the system. Way after the technique itself disappears from the syllabus.

Here's the catch:

Most of what I just described doesn't reveal itself until after you've memorized the sequence and stopped worrying about what comes next.

The depth is there from day one. But you can't see it while you're still counting steps and worrying about memorizing sequence (which is the entry point).

You learn the sequence so you can forget the sequence. Then the real training begins.

Understanding this shift is the difference between collecting techniques and mastering Kenpo.

Just some thoughts from the cheap seats… - Steven Resell


The "Master Key" techniques are the hub of various models of techniques. Apply the formula to those hubs and you arrive at the spokes radiating out from that hub.

Prefix: Adding movements before the base technique.

Suffix: Adding movements after the base technique.

Insert: Adding simultaneous moves (e.g., checks or strikes).

Rearrange: Changing the order of moves.

Alter: Changing the weapon, target, or both.

Adjust: Changing the range or angle of execution.

Regulate: Modifying speed, force, or intent.

Delete: Removing unnecessary moves from a sequence.

Application in Training:

The formula is central to the "Three Phase" training concept:

Ideal Phase: The technique is performed exactly as taught against a specific, anticipated attack.

What If Phase: The technique is modified to handle unexpected changes in the opponent's reaction or size.

Formulation Phase: Developing new, personalized techniques based on the adaptations made in the "what if" phase

BUT: The techniques themselves, Hub or Spoke.... Master Key or derivative of them.... are the HOW.

The real juice of the fruit lies in the "WHY".

the principles and concepts are the why. - John Haag

Long form 6 - list of techniques

Every technique in this form is against a weapon. Also, it is a constant moving form meaning once you start moving at the beginning you don't stop until the isolation set at the end.

-----

Glancing Lance

Unfurling Lance

Clipping the Lance

Thrusting Lance

Raining Lance

Capturing the Storm

Circling the Storm

Escape from the Storm

Entwined Lance

Capturing the Rod

Broken Rod

Defying the Rod

Twisted Rod

(isolation set)

Tuesday, February 3, 2026

The Forward Bow


(from a recent conversation on Facebook)

Mr. Parker demonstrating a Forward Bow transition (notice that I didn't say 'stance'); it can be argued that he is over-exaggerating the forward weight shift, but it is a clear display of the fact that a proper and structurally-practical 'Forward Bow' requires a sufficient weight-change AND shifting the hips FORWARD. 

So many in Kenpo merely pivot their centerline, allowing the front hip to rotate backwards rather than PROJECT both hips FORWARD. - American Society of Kenpo Karate


Absolutely correct. If we're not shifting our weight forward then its still a 50/50 weighted stance. It has to be 60/40 and only a positive shift of weight over the front foot will give you that. We need to move our lower Dantian forward but without leaning. And our rear toes need to be facing dead on 12 o'clock so that our hips also face 12 o'clock. - John Fletcher


Mr. Parker as well as Lee Wedlake stated that when pivoting into a Forward Bow Stance the weight should be 70/30 the 70% should be on the forward leg with the body tilting forward angling diagonally so that there is a straight line from the shoulders to the rear heal. - William Di Carlo


The posture of Mr. Parker in the picture is correct. Feet, weight distribution, and fist posture are all correct. There are two common variances of the "forward bow" predicated on circumstances that include forward momentum and/or a stationary posture. The forward bow in motion is inherently unstable and substitutes principles based on purpose. The stationary version, to be effective, must employ different principles. Both are functional when used within design parameters. When people think of "stances," they tend to think of "feet." Stances are "whole body posture." That is, your feet may be correct; however, if other parts of your posture are incorrect, then the stances become dysfunctional. Additionally, how you arrive at the posture also has an impact. The end product may look perfect, but how you arrived at that posture is equally as important, and therefore, a picture-perfect posture may still be incorrect because the mechanical movements utilized to achieve that perfect look may be wrong and destroy your stance function even though it may not be externally visible. - Ron Chapél


Monday, January 26, 2026

The perfect neutral bow


 

Long form 5 - list of techniques

Sometimes referred to as the "take down" form as well as the "surprise" form.

"Take down" because in all the techniques you are taking your attacker down to the ground, and "surprise" technique because at the beginning after the salutation you do not come to a close, you go right into the first technique with your hands still in the "prayer" position.

-----

Destructive Fans

Dance of Death

Leap of Death

Back Breaker

Hopping Crane

Sleeper

Brushing the Storm

Falling Falcon

Circling the Horizon

Leaping Crane

Monday, January 19, 2026

Mr. Parker interviewed by Mr. Joe Palanzo


An interview for Mr. Palanzo's "Martial Arts in America" program. 

Sadly Mr. Palanzo passed away a couple of weeks ago. He was very close to Mr. Parker, and actually was the first to open an Ed Parker franchise school on the East Coast.

(the sound quality goes in and out at the beginning but improves as the interview goes on.)